The Challenge with Traditional KPIs
Most organisations struggle with KPIs. They either measure the wrong things, create metrics that are too complex to understand, or develop KPIs that don't align with their strategic objectives. This leads to wasted effort, poor decision-making, and frustrated teams.
That's why Bernie Smith created the ROKS methodology and KPI Trees - a simple, structured, and repeatable way for "normal humans" to design and implement KPIs that actually drive business results.
ROKS Methodology
methodology.roks.introBeforeROKS (Results-Orientated KPI System) is a 7-step process that takes you from strategy clarification through to KPI implementation - a structured, repeatable, and logical way to develop KPIs based on clarity of purpose and context.
Clarify where you're trying to go; uses "Big 6" common organisational results as a starting framework
Involve the people who will use the KPIs to ensure buy-in and practical implementation
Use visual techniques (especially KPI Trees) to translate strategic objectives into measures
Pragmatic filtering (importance vs. availability matrix) to identify the most critical, feasible measures
13+ field definition template (name, frequency, measurement intent, units, responsible person, etc.)
Apply "Brilliant Dashboards" approach for clear insight transfer and decision-making
Go live and continuously improve your KPI system based on feedback and results
ROKS Variants
KPI Trees
What is a KPI Tree?
A KPI Tree is a visual diagramming method invented by Bernie Smith in 2011 (first published in KPI Checklists, 2013). It expands on driver trees (Toyota Production System P-M Analysis) and Strategy Maps (Kaplan & Norton) to break down vague aspirational goals into meaningful, measurable KPIs through structured decomposition.
Structure
- Four levels: Top-level strategic objective → broken down twice into logical chunks ("nodes") → specific measurable KPIs at the bottom
- Colour-coded for clarity and easy visual comprehension
- Three types of links: Cause-effect (direct influence), Conflict (red line; highlights need for "check metrics"), and Companion (subset/overlap)
- Distinguishes leading (predictive) vs. lagging (past performance) indicators
Arranges KPIs in clear hierarchy, making complex relationships easy to understand
Gets dominant personalities and diverse stakeholders on the same page
Easy to update when strategy changes, keeping KPIs relevant and actionable
Ensures you don't miss critical measures by systematically decomposing objectives
Define top-level strategic objective
Break down into 2-3 sub-objectives (first layer)
Break those down again (second layer)
Identify specific KPIs at the bottom level
Draw connections (cause-effect, conflict, companion)
Label leading vs. lagging indicators
Review and refine with stakeholders
Ready to Learn More?
Explore our free resources, training programmes, and certification courses to master the ROKS methodology and KPI Trees.